Chile vs Czechoslovakia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Chile
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 9.95 kg/ha against 9.72 kg/ha in Chile, a difference of 0.23 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 69th and Czechoslovakia ranks 67th of 185 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.52 kg/ha | 6.25 kg/ha | 3.73 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 2.49 kg/ha | 8.37 kg/ha | 5.89 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 3.7 kg/ha | 10.22 kg/ha | 6.52 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 5.9 kg/ha | 10.85 kg/ha | 4.95 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Chile or Czechoslovakia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 9.95 kg/ha against 9.72 kg/ha in Chile as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Chile and Czechoslovakia?
- 0.23 kg/ha, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Chile and Czechoslovakia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Chile ranks 69th and Czechoslovakia ranks 67th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).