Cook Islands vs Estonia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Cook Islands
- Estonia
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 9.02 kg/ha against 8.98 kg/ha in Estonia, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cook Islands ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 79th and Estonia ranks 80th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cook Islands averaged higher in 3 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.97 kg/ha | 2.77 kg/ha | 6.2 kg/ha | Cook Islands |
| 2000s | 8.89 kg/ha | 5.4 kg/ha | 3.49 kg/ha | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 9.17 kg/ha | 8.48 kg/ha | 0.6934 kg/ha | Cook Islands |
| 2020s | 9.03 kg/ha | 10.62 kg/ha | 1.59 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Cook Islands or Estonia?
- Cook Islands, at 9.02 kg/ha against 8.98 kg/ha in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Cook Islands and Estonia?
- 0.04 kg/ha, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and Estonia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Cook Islands ranks 79th and Estonia ranks 80th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).