Croatia vs Philippines: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Croatia
- Philippines
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 14.27 kg/ha against 13.14 kg/ha in Philippines, a difference of 1.13 kg/ha.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Philippines ahead.
Croatia ranks 33rd and Philippines ranks 36th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.76 kg/ha | 9.8 kg/ha | 0.0383 kg/ha | Philippines |
| 2000s | 14.06 kg/ha | 11.95 kg/ha | 2.11 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2010s | 15.9 kg/ha | 12.76 kg/ha | 3.13 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2020s | 16.47 kg/ha | 13.16 kg/ha | 3.31 kg/ha | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Croatia or Philippines?
- Croatia, at 14.27 kg/ha against 13.14 kg/ha in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Croatia and Philippines?
- 1.13 kg/ha, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Philippines?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Philippines rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Croatia ranks 33rd and Philippines ranks 36th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).