Dominica vs Georgia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Dominica
- Georgia
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 5.02 kg/ha against 4.67 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.35 kg/ha.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 127th and Georgia ranks 130th of 186 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.68 kg/ha | 2.9 kg/ha | 3.78 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2000s | 4.53 kg/ha | 3.75 kg/ha | 0.7782 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2010s | 4.56 kg/ha | 3.94 kg/ha | 0.6128 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2020s | 4.93 kg/ha | 4.78 kg/ha | 0.1437 kg/ha | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Dominica or Georgia?
- Dominica, at 5.02 kg/ha against 4.67 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Dominica and Georgia?
- 0.35 kg/ha, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Georgia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Dominica ranks 127th and Georgia ranks 130th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).