El Salvador vs Montenegro: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- El Salvador
- Montenegro
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 7.15 kg/ha against 6.99 kg/ha in Montenegro, a difference of 0.16 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
El Salvador ranks 97th and Montenegro ranks 100th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.24 kg/ha | 9.74 kg/ha | 1.5 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 7.47 kg/ha | 7.58 kg/ha | 0.1091 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 7.29 kg/ha | 7.26 kg/ha | 0.0286 kg/ha | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, El Salvador or Montenegro?
- El Salvador, at 7.15 kg/ha against 6.99 kg/ha in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between El Salvador and Montenegro?
- 0.16 kg/ha, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Montenegro rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- El Salvador ranks 97th and Montenegro ranks 100th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).