Eritrea vs Mongolia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 2.16 kg/ha against 2.1 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.06 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mongolia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 190th and Mongolia ranks 189th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.53 kg/ha | 0.8538 kg/ha | 1.68 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1.8 kg/ha | 0.6694 kg/ha | 1.13 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 2.05 kg/ha | 1.51 kg/ha | 0.5351 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 2.1 kg/ha | 2.17 kg/ha | 0.0695 kg/ha | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Eritrea or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 2.16 kg/ha against 2.1 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Eritrea and Mongolia?
- 0.06 kg/ha, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Mongolia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Mongolia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 190th and Mongolia ranks 189th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).