Ethiopia vs Polynesia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Polynesia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 7.44 kg/ha against 7.2 kg/ha in Polynesia, a difference of 0.24 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Polynesia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 102nd and Polynesia ranks 104th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Polynesia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.35 kg/ha | 8.5 kg/ha | 5.15 kg/ha | Polynesia |
| 2000s | 4.31 kg/ha | 10.79 kg/ha | 6.48 kg/ha | Polynesia |
| 2010s | 6.62 kg/ha | 8.96 kg/ha | 2.35 kg/ha | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 7.28 kg/ha | 7.12 kg/ha | 0.1536 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ethiopia or Polynesia?
- Ethiopia, at 7.44 kg/ha against 7.2 kg/ha in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ethiopia and Polynesia?
- 0.24 kg/ha, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Polynesia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Polynesia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 102nd and Polynesia ranks 104th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).