Ethiopia vs South Africa: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 7.7 kg/ha against 7.44 kg/ha in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.26 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was South Africa ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 95th and South Africa ranks 92nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.35 kg/ha | 3.87 kg/ha | 0.5268 kg/ha | South Africa |
| 2000s | 4.31 kg/ha | 4.27 kg/ha | 0.0387 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 6.62 kg/ha | 5.49 kg/ha | 1.12 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 7.28 kg/ha | 7.28 kg/ha | 0.0041 kg/ha | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ethiopia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 7.7 kg/ha against 7.44 kg/ha in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ethiopia and South Africa?
- 0.26 kg/ha, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and South Africa?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and South Africa rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 95th and South Africa ranks 92nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).