Guadeloupe vs Tajikistan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Guadeloupe
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Guadeloupe currently reports 12.77 kg/ha against 12.11 kg/ha in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.66 kg/ha.
That makes Guadeloupe's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Guadeloupe has been ahead every year.
Guadeloupe ranks 39th and Tajikistan ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
Guadeloupe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guadeloupe | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.17 kg/ha | 7.22 kg/ha | 2.95 kg/ha | Guadeloupe |
| 2000s | 13.02 kg/ha | 10.45 kg/ha | 2.57 kg/ha | Guadeloupe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Guadeloupe or Tajikistan?
- Guadeloupe, at 12.77 kg/ha against 12.11 kg/ha in Tajikistan as of 2006.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Guadeloupe and Tajikistan?
- 0.66 kg/ha, with Guadeloupe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guadeloupe and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2006.
- How do Guadeloupe and Tajikistan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Guadeloupe ranks 39th and Tajikistan ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).