Haiti vs South Sudan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Haiti
- South Sudan
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 2.99 kg/ha against 2.99 kg/ha in South Sudan, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Haiti has been ahead every year.
Haiti ranks 162nd and South Sudan ranks 163rd of 186 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.53 kg/ha | 2.45 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2020s | 3.08 kg/ha | 2.86 kg/ha | 0.2138 kg/ha | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Haiti or South Sudan?
- Haiti, at 2.99 kg/ha against 2.99 kg/ha in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Haiti and South Sudan?
- 0 kg/ha, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and South Sudan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Haiti ranks 162nd and South Sudan ranks 163rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).