India vs Lithuania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- India
- Lithuania
How they compare
India currently reports 13.79 kg/ha against 12.92 kg/ha in Lithuania, a difference of 0.87 kg/ha.
That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was India ahead.
India ranks 37th and Lithuania ranks 39th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, India averaged higher in 3 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.1 kg/ha | 3.93 kg/ha | 3.17 kg/ha | India |
| 2000s | 8.21 kg/ha | 7.12 kg/ha | 1.09 kg/ha | India |
| 2010s | 11.19 kg/ha | 10.62 kg/ha | 0.5705 kg/ha | India |
| 2020s | 13.18 kg/ha | 13.44 kg/ha | 0.2538 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, India or Lithuania?
- India, at 13.79 kg/ha against 12.92 kg/ha in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between India and Lithuania?
- 0.87 kg/ha, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do India and Lithuania rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- India ranks 37th and Lithuania ranks 39th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).