Kiribati vs Serbia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Kiribati
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 16.42 kg/ha against 14.99 kg/ha in Kiribati, a difference of 1.43 kg/ha.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Kiribati ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 28th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.9 kg/ha | 12.34 kg/ha | 0.5585 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 14.73 kg/ha | 14.05 kg/ha | 0.6791 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 14.25 kg/ha | 15.47 kg/ha | 1.21 kg/ha | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Kiribati or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 16.42 kg/ha against 14.99 kg/ha in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Kiribati and Serbia?
- 1.43 kg/ha, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Serbia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Kiribati ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 28th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).