Latvia vs Sri Lanka: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 10.21 kg/ha against 10.09 kg/ha in Latvia, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Latvia ranks 63rd and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 186 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.71 kg/ha | 9.2 kg/ha | 5.49 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 5.6 kg/ha | 10.15 kg/ha | 4.56 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 9.06 kg/ha | 11.05 kg/ha | 1.99 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 11.38 kg/ha | 11.41 kg/ha | 0.0358 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Latvia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 10.21 kg/ha against 10.09 kg/ha in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Latvia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Sri Lanka rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 63rd and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).