Latvia vs Uruguay: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 10.09 kg/ha against 9.96 kg/ha in Uruguay, a difference of 0.13 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
Latvia ranks 63rd and Uruguay ranks 66th of 185 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.71 kg/ha | 5.3 kg/ha | 1.59 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 5.6 kg/ha | 7.25 kg/ha | 1.65 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 9.06 kg/ha | 12.48 kg/ha | 3.42 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 11.38 kg/ha | 12.88 kg/ha | 1.5 kg/ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Latvia or Uruguay?
- Latvia, at 10.09 kg/ha against 9.96 kg/ha in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Latvia and Uruguay?
- 0.13 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Uruguay rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 63rd and Uruguay ranks 66th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).