Serbia vs Slovakia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Serbia
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 16.64 kg/ha against 16.42 kg/ha in Serbia, a difference of 0.22 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 28th and Slovakia ranks 26th of 186 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.34 kg/ha | 11.42 kg/ha | 0.9269 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2010s | 14.05 kg/ha | 13.13 kg/ha | 0.919 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2020s | 15.47 kg/ha | 15.34 kg/ha | 0.1287 kg/ha | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Serbia or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 16.64 kg/ha against 16.42 kg/ha in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Serbia and Slovakia?
- 0.22 kg/ha, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Slovakia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Slovakia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Serbia ranks 28th and Slovakia ranks 26th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).