Serbia vs Syrian Arab Republic: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Serbia
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 16.42 kg/ha against 5.42 kg/ha in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 11 kg/ha.
That makes Serbia's figure about 3.0 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 28th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 14th of 186 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.34 kg/ha | 6.82 kg/ha | 5.52 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2010s | 14.05 kg/ha | 5.05 kg/ha | 8.99 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2020s | 15.47 kg/ha | 4.63 kg/ha | 10.84 kg/ha | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Serbia or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Serbia, at 16.42 kg/ha against 5.42 kg/ha in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Serbia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 11 kg/ha, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Serbia ranks 28th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 14th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).