Suriname vs Tajikistan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Suriname
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 12.11 kg/ha against 11.78 kg/ha in Suriname, a difference of 0.33 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Suriname ahead.
Suriname ranks 45th and Tajikistan ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.86 kg/ha | 7.22 kg/ha | 3.65 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2000s | 10.89 kg/ha | 10.62 kg/ha | 0.2743 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2010s | 13.44 kg/ha | 11.87 kg/ha | 1.57 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2020s | 12.39 kg/ha | 12.04 kg/ha | 0.3475 kg/ha | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Suriname or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 12.11 kg/ha against 11.78 kg/ha in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Suriname and Tajikistan?
- 0.33 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Suriname and Tajikistan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Suriname ranks 45th and Tajikistan ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).