Algeria vs Malawi: Crop harvest removal β Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Algeria
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 35,989 t against 35,124 t in Algeria, a difference of 865 t.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 65th and Malawi ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 6 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,385 t | 5,032 t | 4,353 t | Algeria |
| 1970s | 10,029 t | 7,035 t | 2,994 t | Algeria |
| 1980s | 10,878 t | 7,818 t | 3,060 t | Algeria |
| 1990s | 14,167 t | 9,821 t | 4,347 t | Algeria |
| 2000s | 19,588 t | 15,957 t | 3,631 t | Algeria |
| 2010s | 32,984 t | 27,617 t | 5,368 t | Algeria |
| 2020s | 34,693 t | 35,847 t | 1,155 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal β cropland phosphorus, Algeria or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 35,989 t against 35,124 t in Algeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal β cropland phosphorus between Algeria and Malawi?
- 865 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Algeria and Malawi rank globally for crop harvest removal β cropland phosphorus?
- Algeria ranks 65th and Malawi ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).