Belgium vs Chad: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belgium
- Chad
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 18,085 t against 16,914 t in Chad, a difference of 1,171 t.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 81st and Chad ranks 84th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Chad in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19,479 t | 10,581 t | 8,898 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 19,092 t | 17,306 t | 1,787 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 17,467 t | 17,729 t | 261.85 t | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Belgium or Chad?
- Belgium, at 18,085 t against 16,914 t in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Belgium and Chad?
- 1,171 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Chad?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Chad rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Belgium ranks 81st and Chad ranks 84th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).