Belgium vs Ecuador: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belgium
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 19,080 t against 18,085 t in Belgium, a difference of 995 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 81st and Ecuador ranks 79th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19,479 t | 15,703 t | 3,776 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 19,092 t | 18,550 t | 542.39 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 17,467 t | 19,677 t | 2,210 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Belgium or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 19,080 t against 18,085 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Belgium and Ecuador?
- 995 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Ecuador?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Ecuador rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Belgium ranks 81st and Ecuador ranks 79th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).