Bhutan vs Comoros: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Bhutan
- Comoros
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 468.64 t against 343.97 t in Bhutan, a difference of 124.67 t.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.4 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 167th and Comoros ranks 164th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 6 and Comoros in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 383.18 t | 240.13 t | 143.04 t | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 485.39 t | 257.92 t | 227.47 t | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 559.67 t | 251.18 t | 308.49 t | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 540.21 t | 299.53 t | 240.67 t | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 606.25 t | 307.95 t | 298.3 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 659.63 t | 447.67 t | 211.96 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 401.27 t | 481.04 t | 79.77 t | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Bhutan or Comoros?
- Comoros, at 468.64 t against 343.97 t in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Bhutan and Comoros?
- 124.67 t, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Comoros?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Comoros rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Bhutan ranks 167th and Comoros ranks 164th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).