Bhutan vs Guadeloupe: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Bhutan
- Guadeloupe
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 343.97 t against 306.41 t in Guadeloupe, a difference of 37.56 t.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Guadeloupe's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guadeloupe ahead.
Bhutan ranks 154th and Guadeloupe ranks 155th of 185 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Guadeloupe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Guadeloupe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 383.18 t | 667.28 t | 284.11 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1970s | 485.39 t | 495.68 t | 10.29 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1980s | 559.67 t | 336.63 t | 223.04 t | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 540.21 t | 267.84 t | 272.37 t | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 563.71 t | 317.24 t | 246.47 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Bhutan or Guadeloupe?
- Bhutan, at 343.97 t against 306.41 t in Guadeloupe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Bhutan and Guadeloupe?
- 37.56 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Guadeloupe?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2006.
- How do Bhutan and Guadeloupe rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Bhutan ranks 154th and Guadeloupe ranks 155th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).