Cambodia vs Czechoslovakia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cambodia
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 50,042 t against 49,013 t in Cambodia, a difference of 1,029 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 40th and Czechoslovakia ranks 39th of 185 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,061 t | 33,640 t | 24,579 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 5,531 t | 44,218 t | 38,686 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 6,674 t | 52,610 t | 45,936 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 8,342 t | 54,864 t | 46,522 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Cambodia or Czechoslovakia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 50,042 t against 49,013 t in Cambodia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Cambodia and Czechoslovakia?
- 1,029 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Cambodia and Czechoslovakia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Cambodia ranks 40th and Czechoslovakia ranks 39th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).