Canada vs Indonesia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Canada
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 503,936 t against 430,338 t in Canada, a difference of 73,598 t.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.2 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Indonesia ahead.
Canada ranks 8th and Indonesia ranks 7th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 4 and Indonesia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 126,152 t | 88,411 t | 37,741 t | Canada |
| 1970s | 158,685 t | 122,272 t | 36,413 t | Canada |
| 1980s | 211,594 t | 192,302 t | 19,292 t | Canada |
| 1990s | 270,224 t | 268,717 t | 1,508 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 294,384 t | 343,268 t | 48,884 t | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 418,913 t | 453,652 t | 34,739 t | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 431,656 t | 499,825 t | 68,168 t | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Canada or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 503,936 t against 430,338 t in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Canada and Indonesia?
- 73,598 t, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Indonesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Indonesia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Canada ranks 8th and Indonesia ranks 7th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).