Caribbean vs Czechoslovakia: Crop harvest removal β Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Caribbean
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 53,237 t against 50,042 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 3,195 t.
That makes Caribbean's figure about 1.1 times Czechoslovakia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Caribbean ahead.
Caribbean ranks 41st and Czechoslovakia ranks 44th of 201 groups.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 32,949 t | 33,640 t | 690.79 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 38,222 t | 44,218 t | 5,996 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 41,629 t | 52,610 t | 10,981 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 41,806 t | 54,864 t | 13,058 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal β cropland phosphorus, Caribbean or Czechoslovakia?
- Caribbean, at 53,237 t against 50,042 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal β cropland phosphorus between Caribbean and Czechoslovakia?
- 3,195 t, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Caribbean and Czechoslovakia rank globally for crop harvest removal β cropland phosphorus?
- Caribbean ranks 41st and Czechoslovakia ranks 44th of 201 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).