Central America vs Ethiopia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central America
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Central America currently reports 258,233 t against 137,388 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 120,845 t.
That makes Central America's figure about 1.9 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Central America has been ahead every year.
Central America ranks 23rd and Ethiopia ranks 22nd of 29 groups.
Central America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 180,070 t | 35,152 t | 144,918 t | Central America |
| 2000s | 207,673 t | 55,947 t | 151,725 t | Central America |
| 2010s | 244,329 t | 113,260 t | 131,069 t | Central America |
| 2020s | 259,010 t | 134,898 t | 124,112 t | Central America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Central America or Ethiopia?
- Central America, at 258,233 t against 137,388 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Central America and Ethiopia?
- 120,845 t, with Central America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Central America and Ethiopia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Central America ranks 23rd and Ethiopia ranks 22nd of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).