Central Asia vs Ethiopia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central Asia
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 210,665 t against 137,388 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 73,277 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.5 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 25th and Ethiopia ranks 22nd of 29 groups.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 143,177 t | 35,152 t | 108,025 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 174,477 t | 55,947 t | 118,530 t | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 202,529 t | 113,260 t | 89,269 t | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 219,631 t | 134,898 t | 84,733 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Central Asia or Ethiopia?
- Central Asia, at 210,665 t against 137,388 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Central Asia and Ethiopia?
- 73,277 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Ethiopia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Central Asia ranks 25th and Ethiopia ranks 22nd of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).