Chad vs Portugal: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Chad
- Portugal
How they compare
Chad currently reports 16,914 t against 15,485 t in Portugal, a difference of 1,429 t.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.
Chad ranks 84th and Portugal ranks 86th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 3 and Portugal in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,250 t | 14,077 t | 8,828 t | Portugal |
| 1970s | 4,825 t | 11,899 t | 7,075 t | Portugal |
| 1980s | 4,738 t | 10,893 t | 6,155 t | Portugal |
| 1990s | 7,560 t | 11,181 t | 3,621 t | Portugal |
| 2000s | 10,581 t | 9,561 t | 1,020 t | Chad |
| 2010s | 17,306 t | 11,156 t | 6,150 t | Chad |
| 2020s | 17,729 t | 14,183 t | 3,546 t | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Chad or Portugal?
- Chad, at 16,914 t against 15,485 t in Portugal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Chad and Portugal?
- 1,429 t, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Portugal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Portugal rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Chad ranks 84th and Portugal ranks 86th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).