Congo vs Georgia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Congo
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 2,018 t against 1,508 t in Congo, a difference of 510 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 146th and Georgia ranks 144th of 201 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 815.47 t | 3,140 t | 2,324 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 1,058 t | 2,723 t | 1,665 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 1,365 t | 1,880 t | 514.91 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 1,503 t | 2,097 t | 593.46 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Congo or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 2,018 t against 1,508 t in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Congo and Georgia?
- 510 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Georgia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Congo ranks 146th and Georgia ranks 144th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).