Côte d'Ivoire vs Italy: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 97,203 t against 56,686 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 40,517 t.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.7 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th and Italy ranks 28th of 29 groups.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,956 t | 101,986 t | 96,030 t | Italy |
| 1970s | 9,686 t | 108,955 t | 99,270 t | Italy |
| 1980s | 16,188 t | 123,134 t | 106,947 t | Italy |
| 1990s | 22,011 t | 127,595 t | 105,584 t | Italy |
| 2000s | 27,478 t | 125,964 t | 98,485 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 40,537 t | 107,989 t | 67,452 t | Italy |
| 2020s | 53,735 t | 97,314 t | 43,579 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Côte d'Ivoire or Italy?
- Italy, at 97,203 t against 56,686 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Côte d'Ivoire and Italy?
- 40,517 t, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Italy?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Italy rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th and Italy ranks 28th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).