Cuba vs South Sudan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cuba
- South Sudan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 7,938 t against 7,705 t in South Sudan, a difference of 233 t.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 104th and South Sudan ranks 105th of 186 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15,372 t | 6,373 t | 8,999 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 9,126 t | 7,172 t | 1,954 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Cuba or South Sudan?
- Cuba, at 7,938 t against 7,705 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Cuba and South Sudan?
- 233 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and South Sudan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Cuba ranks 104th and South Sudan ranks 105th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).