Cyprus vs Lesotho: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cyprus
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 610.58 t against 513.64 t in Cyprus, a difference of 96.94 t.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.2 times Cyprus's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 162nd and Lesotho ranks 159th of 201 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,171 t | 838.06 t | 332.91 t | Cyprus |
| 1970s | 982.1 t | 786.01 t | 196.09 t | Cyprus |
| 1980s | 906.95 t | 633.08 t | 273.87 t | Cyprus |
| 1990s | 931.02 t | 674.13 t | 256.89 t | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 755.89 t | 539.83 t | 216.07 t | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 525.37 t | 517.61 t | 7.76 t | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 536.82 t | 453.12 t | 83.7 t | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Cyprus or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 610.58 t against 513.64 t in Cyprus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Cyprus and Lesotho?
- 96.94 t, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Lesotho?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Lesotho rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Cyprus ranks 162nd and Lesotho ranks 159th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).