Czechia vs Sudan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechia
- Sudan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 43,212 t against 41,352 t in Sudan, a difference of 1,860 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 45th and Sudan ranks 47th of 186 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41,512 t | 45,252 t | 3,739 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 42,738 t | 50,760 t | 8,022 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Czechia or Sudan?
- Czechia, at 43,212 t against 41,352 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Czechia and Sudan?
- 1,860 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Sudan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechia ranks 45th and Sudan ranks 47th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).