Czechoslovakia vs Nepal: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Nepal
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 50,042 t against 48,780 t in Nepal, a difference of 1,262 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 44th and Nepal ranks 46th of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 33,640 t | 11,266 t | 22,374 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 44,218 t | 12,849 t | 31,368 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 52,610 t | 16,440 t | 36,170 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 54,864 t | 21,839 t | 33,025 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Czechoslovakia or Nepal?
- Czechoslovakia, at 50,042 t against 48,780 t in Nepal as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Czechoslovakia and Nepal?
- 1,262 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Nepal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Nepal rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 44th and Nepal ranks 46th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).