Djibouti vs Dominica: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Djibouti
- Dominica
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 115.39 t against 103.33 t in Djibouti, a difference of 12.06 t.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.1 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.
Djibouti ranks 164th and Dominica ranks 162nd of 186 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.23 t | 79.19 t | 77.96 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 2.3 t | 99.04 t | 96.74 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 17.94 t | 104.43 t | 86.48 t | Dominica |
| 1990s | 32.81 t | 105.59 t | 72.78 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 36.97 t | 90.52 t | 53.55 t | Dominica |
| 2010s | 58.97 t | 104.82 t | 45.85 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 105.45 t | 113.31 t | 7.87 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Djibouti or Dominica?
- Dominica, at 115.39 t against 103.33 t in Djibouti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Djibouti and Dominica?
- 12.06 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Dominica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Dominica rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Djibouti ranks 164th and Dominica ranks 162nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).