Ecuador vs Iraq: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ecuador
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 21,399 t against 19,080 t in Ecuador, a difference of 2,319 t.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 28 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.
Ecuador ranks 79th and Iraq ranks 76th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,657 t | 9,277 t | 620.39 t | Iraq |
| 1970s | 8,205 t | 9,474 t | 1,269 t | Iraq |
| 1980s | 9,423 t | 9,966 t | 543.53 t | Iraq |
| 1990s | 13,182 t | 13,474 t | 292.51 t | Iraq |
| 2000s | 15,703 t | 14,835 t | 868.42 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 18,550 t | 20,855 t | 2,305 t | Iraq |
| 2020s | 19,677 t | 24,670 t | 4,993 t | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Ecuador or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 21,399 t against 19,080 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Ecuador and Iraq?
- 2,319 t, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Iraq?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Iraq rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Ecuador ranks 79th and Iraq ranks 76th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).