Egypt vs Ethiopia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Egypt
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 137,388 t against 128,418 t in Egypt, a difference of 8,970 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 24th and Ethiopia ranks 22nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 3 and Ethiopia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 84,395 t | 35,152 t | 49,242 t | Egypt |
| 2000s | 104,915 t | 55,947 t | 48,968 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 115,692 t | 113,260 t | 2,432 t | Egypt |
| 2020s | 125,768 t | 134,898 t | 9,129 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Egypt or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 137,388 t against 128,418 t in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Egypt and Ethiopia?
- 8,970 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Ethiopia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Egypt ranks 24th and Ethiopia ranks 22nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).