Eswatini vs Georgia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eswatini
- Georgia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 2,123 t against 2,018 t in Georgia, a difference of 105 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 129th and Georgia ranks 132nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,820 t | 3,140 t | 1,320 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 1,806 t | 2,723 t | 917.61 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 2,081 t | 1,880 t | 200.66 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 2,143 t | 2,097 t | 46.28 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Eswatini or Georgia?
- Eswatini, at 2,123 t against 2,018 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Eswatini and Georgia?
- 105 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Georgia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Eswatini ranks 129th and Georgia ranks 132nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).