Ethiopia PDR vs Sri Lanka: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 26,748 t against 26,199 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 549 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 62nd and Sri Lanka ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 22,922 t | 9,911 t | 13,010 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 24,357 t | 11,196 t | 13,161 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 29,000 t | 14,119 t | 14,881 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 29,728 t | 15,475 t | 14,253 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia PDR or Sri Lanka?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 26,748 t against 26,199 t in Sri Lanka as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia PDR and Sri Lanka?
- 549 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Sri Lanka rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 62nd and Sri Lanka ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).