Ethiopia vs Philippines: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 147,497 t against 137,388 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 10,109 t.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 24th and Philippines ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35,152 t | 96,590 t | 61,438 t | Philippines |
| 2000s | 55,947 t | 119,867 t | 63,920 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 113,260 t | 140,005 t | 26,745 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 134,898 t | 147,081 t | 12,184 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 147,497 t against 137,388 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia and Philippines?
- 10,109 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Philippines?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Philippines rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia ranks 24th and Philippines ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).