Fiji vs Namibia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Fiji
- Namibia
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 914.52 t against 792.79 t in Namibia, a difference of 121.73 t.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 152nd and Namibia ranks 155th of 201 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,541 t | 220.4 t | 1,320 t | Fiji |
| 1970s | 1,547 t | 297.6 t | 1,249 t | Fiji |
| 1980s | 1,758 t | 383.3 t | 1,375 t | Fiji |
| 1990s | 1,772 t | 484.55 t | 1,288 t | Fiji |
| 2000s | 1,559 t | 660.23 t | 898.39 t | Fiji |
| 2010s | 807.74 t | 664.65 t | 143.09 t | Fiji |
| 2020s | 859.84 t | 843.07 t | 16.77 t | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Fiji or Namibia?
- Fiji, at 914.52 t against 792.79 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Fiji and Namibia?
- 121.73 t, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Namibia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Namibia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Fiji ranks 152nd and Namibia ranks 155th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).