Finland vs Zimbabwe: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Finland
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 14,106 t against 12,813 t in Finland, a difference of 1,293 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 92nd and Zimbabwe ranks 89th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,782 t | 6,198 t | 2,584 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 12,568 t | 10,392 t | 2,176 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 13,712 t | 13,213 t | 498.61 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 14,286 t | 11,928 t | 2,358 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 16,293 t | 12,002 t | 4,291 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 14,732 t | 10,501 t | 4,230 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 13,292 t | 14,331 t | 1,038 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Finland or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 14,106 t against 12,813 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Finland and Zimbabwe?
- 1,293 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Zimbabwe rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Finland ranks 92nd and Zimbabwe ranks 89th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).