Greece vs Tunisia: Crop harvest removal β Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Greece
- Tunisia
How they compare
Greece currently reports 16,731 t against 14,891 t in Tunisia, a difference of 1,840 t.
That makes Greece's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 96th and Tunisia ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25,277 t | 6,017 t | 19,260 t | Greece |
| 1970s | 32,931 t | 9,565 t | 23,366 t | Greece |
| 1980s | 44,192 t | 10,205 t | 33,987 t | Greece |
| 1990s | 52,830 t | 15,597 t | 37,234 t | Greece |
| 2000s | 55,546 t | 15,676 t | 39,870 t | Greece |
| 2010s | 50,374 t | 17,608 t | 32,766 t | Greece |
| 2020s | 33,589 t | 19,184 t | 14,405 t | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal β cropland phosphorus, Greece or Tunisia?
- Greece, at 16,731 t against 14,891 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal β cropland phosphorus between Greece and Tunisia?
- 1,840 t, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Greece and Tunisia rank globally for crop harvest removal β cropland phosphorus?
- Greece ranks 96th and Tunisia ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).