Guadeloupe vs Puerto Rico: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Guadeloupe
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Guadeloupe currently reports 306.41 t against 286.31 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 20.1 t.
That makes Guadeloupe's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Guadeloupe ranks 155th and Puerto Rico ranks 157th of 186 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Guadeloupe averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guadeloupe | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 667.28 t | 2,801 t | 2,134 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 495.68 t | 1,303 t | 806.92 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 336.63 t | 699.97 t | 363.34 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 267.84 t | 359.59 t | 91.75 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 317.24 t | 253.04 t | 64.2 t | Guadeloupe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Guadeloupe or Puerto Rico?
- Guadeloupe, at 306.41 t against 286.31 t in Puerto Rico as of 2006.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Guadeloupe and Puerto Rico?
- 20.1 t, with Guadeloupe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guadeloupe and Puerto Rico?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2006.
- How do Guadeloupe and Puerto Rico rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Guadeloupe ranks 155th and Puerto Rico ranks 157th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).