Guatemala vs Guinea: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Guatemala
- Guinea
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 25,564 t against 25,469 t in Guinea, a difference of 95 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 64th and Guinea ranks 65th of 185 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,831 t | 3,234 t | 2,596 t | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 9,430 t | 3,786 t | 5,644 t | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 10,382 t | 4,727 t | 5,655 t | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 12,329 t | 7,082 t | 5,247 t | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 16,294 t | 10,758 t | 5,536 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 23,885 t | 15,851 t | 8,034 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 25,236 t | 22,883 t | 2,353 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Guatemala or Guinea?
- Guatemala, at 25,564 t against 25,469 t in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Guatemala and Guinea?
- 95 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Guinea rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Guatemala ranks 64th and Guinea ranks 65th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).