Honduras vs Rwanda: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Honduras
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 10,404 t against 8,290 t in Honduras, a difference of 2,114 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.3 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Honduras ranks 114th and Rwanda ranks 111th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,597 t | 2,744 t | 146.77 t | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 3,157 t | 3,901 t | 744.2 t | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 4,084 t | 5,097 t | 1,013 t | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 5,029 t | 4,168 t | 861.63 t | Honduras |
| 2000s | 6,187 t | 6,832 t | 645.64 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 7,733 t | 9,442 t | 1,708 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 8,141 t | 10,252 t | 2,112 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Honduras or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 10,404 t against 8,290 t in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Honduras and Rwanda?
- 2,114 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Rwanda rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Honduras ranks 114th and Rwanda ranks 111th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).