Iceland vs Maldives: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Iceland
- Maldives
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 35.17 t against 33.4 t in Maldives, a difference of 1.77 t.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Maldives ahead.
Iceland ranks 173rd and Maldives ranks 174th of 185 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.86 t | 39.07 t | 32.21 t | Maldives |
| 1970s | 7.21 t | 42.83 t | 35.62 t | Maldives |
| 1980s | 11.1 t | 57.68 t | 46.58 t | Maldives |
| 1990s | 9.58 t | 50.41 t | 40.83 t | Maldives |
| 2000s | 11.07 t | 71.49 t | 60.42 t | Maldives |
| 2010s | 20.28 t | 44.63 t | 24.35 t | Maldives |
| 2020s | 35.49 t | 39.44 t | 3.95 t | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Iceland or Maldives?
- Iceland, at 35.17 t against 33.4 t in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Iceland and Maldives?
- 1.77 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Maldives?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Maldives rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Iceland ranks 173rd and Maldives ranks 174th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).