Jamaica vs Mauritius: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Jamaica
- Mauritius
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 1,188 t against 857.84 t in Mauritius, a difference of 330.16 t.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.4 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 139th and Mauritius ranks 141st of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 6 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,191 t | 1,680 t | 510.96 t | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 1,987 t | 1,844 t | 142.84 t | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 1,701 t | 1,778 t | 76.68 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 2,029 t | 1,745 t | 283.72 t | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 1,927 t | 1,599 t | 328.43 t | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 1,350 t | 1,264 t | 86.75 t | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 1,259 t | 850.54 t | 408.86 t | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Jamaica or Mauritius?
- Jamaica, at 1,188 t against 857.84 t in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Jamaica and Mauritius?
- 330.16 t, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Mauritius rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Jamaica ranks 139th and Mauritius ranks 141st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).