Kenya vs Serbia, Republic of: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Kenya
- Serbia, Republic of
How they compare
Serbia, Republic of currently reports 46,245 t against 42,278 t in Kenya, a difference of 3,967 t.
That makes Serbia, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia, Republic of ahead.
Kenya ranks 46th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 44th of 185 countries.
Serbia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Serbia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27,519 t | 34,716 t | 7,197 t | Serbia, Republic of |
| 2010s | 35,265 t | 39,287 t | 4,022 t | Serbia, Republic of |
| 2020s | 39,534 t | 43,521 t | 3,988 t | Serbia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Kenya or Serbia, Republic of?
- Serbia, Republic of, at 46,245 t against 42,278 t in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Kenya and Serbia, Republic of?
- 3,967 t, with Serbia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Serbia, Republic of?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Serbia, Republic of rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Kenya ranks 46th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 44th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).