Kiribati vs Luxembourg: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Kiribati
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 608.37 t against 509.62 t in Kiribati, a difference of 98.75 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Kiribati ranks 150th and Luxembourg ranks 147th of 186 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 350.79 t | 735.7 t | 384.91 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 500.68 t | 696.55 t | 195.87 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 484.58 t | 626.31 t | 141.73 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Kiribati or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 608.37 t against 509.62 t in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Kiribati and Luxembourg?
- 98.75 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Luxembourg rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Kiribati ranks 150th and Luxembourg ranks 147th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).